Below are images from "SUNDAY IN NEW YORK", the 1963 adaptation of Norman Krasna's 1961 Broadway play. Directed by Peter Tewksbury, the movie starred Rod Taylor, Jane Fonda and Cliff Robertson:
"SUNDAY IN NEW YORK" (1963) Photo Gallery
.jpg)
Showing posts with label cliff robertson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cliff robertson. Show all posts
Friday, August 22, 2025
Tuesday, February 11, 2025
"ALL IN A NIGHT'S WORK" (1961) Review
"ALL IN A NIGHT'S WORK" (1961) Review
Sixty-four years ago, Paramount Pictures released a quirky romantic comedy directed by a journeyman director named Joseph Anthony. The movie had been released during a period in Hollywood that saw the release of a good number of films known as "bedroom comedies". The most famous of these movies featured the Doris Day/Rock Hudson screen team from Universal Pictures. But one of the most unlikely bedroom comedies I have come across was Anthony's 1961 flick, "ALL IN A NIGHT'S WORK".
The movie begins with the death of a wealthy magazine publisher inside a Palms Beach, Florida hotel. The dead man's playboy nephew, Tony Ryder, inherits the company; but is left with a board of directors whose members believe he is unsuited for the task of managing it. Even worse, the Palm Beach hotel's detective, Mr. Lasker, informs Tony and the board of the young woman he had spotted running away from his uncle's hotel room, wearing nothing but a Turkish towel and an earring, on the night of Colonel Ryder's death. Both Tony and Lasker discover that the young woman in question is Katie Robbins, a Ryder employee who works for the magazine's research department. Anticipating a bank loan, Tony and the Board members fear Katie might blackmail the company or expose the Colonel's promiscuous past. They, along with Lasker, resort to learning the truth about Katie's encounter with Colonel Ryder or ensure her marriage to her strait-laced veterinarian fiancé in order to silence her about the Colonel's death at all costs.
That is correct folks. "ALL IN A NIGHT'S WORK" is basically a comedy about mistaken identity. You see, Tony Ryder and the Board members mistakenly believe she may have been the Colonel's past mistress. The reality is that Katie had found herself in the magnate's hotel room by mistake and under different circumstances. She had been fleeing from a drunken millionaire whom she had saved from drowning in the hotel's swimming pool . . . and who had repaid her Good Samaritan act with an aggressive attempt at seduction. So much for good deeds. Because Tony and the Board need funds to finance the magazine's expansion, they view Katie's encounter with the dead Colonel as a potential threat.
Superficially, "ALL IN A NIGHT'S WORK" seemed like one of those typical sex comedies that Hollywood studios made by the dozens from the late 1950s to the mid-1960s. I certainly would not describe the 1961 comedy as the best of the bunch. Its portrayal of Midwesterners struck me as bit one-dimensional. And modern-day filmgoers might find some of its attitude toward women slightly offensive. I refer to one scene in which Tony not only admire Katie for her brains, but also admire her ability to hide her brains. Like . . . what the hell? Regardless of those little peccadilloes and the fact that I do not regard it as one of the best mid-century sex comedies I have seen . . . I rather enjoyed "ALL IN A NIGHT'S WORK". In fact, I more than enjoyed it. I found it slightly unusual from the usual flicks of its genre.
What was it about "ALL IN A NIGHT'S WORK" that I found unusual? For me, the real humor stemmed from the corruption that reeked in the film's narrative. Whether that corruption came from the countless men who try to proposition Katie - including Tony, to the Board and Lasker's assumption that Katie was the Colonel's mistress without really knowing her story. In one funny sequence, Katie has a disastrous evening on the town with her fiancé Dr. Warren Kingsley, Jr. and his visiting Kansas parents, thanks to Tony's interference at two nightclubs and Mrs. Kingsley's negative judgmental attitude toward her. Yet, the most hilarious example of the corruption that permeated the film came from the topic of greed in the form of the Board of Directors. Desperate to acquire the bank loan to expand the magazine, they not only bemoaned the possibility of Katie blackmailing them but discussed various ways to silence her and ensure that loan. They were absolutely hilarious. The only other sex comedy that I believe permeated with corruption in the form of business survival was the 1961 Doris Day/Rock Hudson film, "LOVER COME BACK". Nineteen sixty-one was an interesting year.
Am much as I had enjoyed the movie's narrative, what I really enjoyed about "ALL IN A NIGHT'S WORK" was its cast. The movie featured first-rate performances from supporting cast members like Norma Crane, Rosemarie Stack, Ian Wolfe, John Hudson and a very funny Jack Weston, who portrayed the Palm Beach hotel detective who had first spotted Katie leaving Colonel Ryder's suite. Cliff Robertson gave solid support as Katie's upright fiancé Dr. Warren Kingsley Jr. Mable Albertson was appropriately prim and oppressive as young Warren's priggish mother. On the other hand, Charles Ruggles gave a very charming performance as Dr. Warren Kinglsey Sr., the only member of the Kingsley family who knew how to enjoy a good time.
However, there were at least five performances that I truly enjoyed. Three of them came from Gale Gordon, Jerome Cowan and Ralph Dumke; who portrayed the senior members of the Board Members. Watching them bemoan over the possibility of Katie being Colonel Ryder's mistress and plot to find ways to keep her silent were among the true highlights of the film. And then we have our two leads - Dean Martin and Shirley MacLaine. I just realized the pair had made six films together. Six. I suppose I should not have been surprised. Martin and MacLaine had great screen chemistry. And this was apparent in their scenes together. Martin's smooth charm and subtle sense of humor contrasted perfectly with MacLaine's more nervous and kinetic performance as the much put upon Katie. I also enjoyed Martin's subtle, yet sly reactions to the Board Members' bombastic plotting against the movie's leading lady. And what I also enjoyed about MacLaine's performance is how she managed to convey Katie's worldliness beneath a seemingly naive persona - especially when dealing with over amorous men.
Earlier, I had stated that I did not consider "ALL IN A NIGHT'S WORK" as one of the best sex comedies from the mid-20th century. Perhaps it is not one of the best. But I now believe it is one of the most original I have ever come across. It might also be one of my favorites from that particular era in Hollywood history, thanks to Joseph Anthony's solid direction; a first-rate screenplay written by Edmund Beloin, Maurice Richlin and the legendary Sidney Sheldon; and superb comedic performances from a cast led by Dean Martin and Shirley MacLaine. What else can I say?
Sixty-four years ago, Paramount Pictures released a quirky romantic comedy directed by a journeyman director named Joseph Anthony. The movie had been released during a period in Hollywood that saw the release of a good number of films known as "bedroom comedies". The most famous of these movies featured the Doris Day/Rock Hudson screen team from Universal Pictures. But one of the most unlikely bedroom comedies I have come across was Anthony's 1961 flick, "ALL IN A NIGHT'S WORK".
The movie begins with the death of a wealthy magazine publisher inside a Palms Beach, Florida hotel. The dead man's playboy nephew, Tony Ryder, inherits the company; but is left with a board of directors whose members believe he is unsuited for the task of managing it. Even worse, the Palm Beach hotel's detective, Mr. Lasker, informs Tony and the board of the young woman he had spotted running away from his uncle's hotel room, wearing nothing but a Turkish towel and an earring, on the night of Colonel Ryder's death. Both Tony and Lasker discover that the young woman in question is Katie Robbins, a Ryder employee who works for the magazine's research department. Anticipating a bank loan, Tony and the Board members fear Katie might blackmail the company or expose the Colonel's promiscuous past. They, along with Lasker, resort to learning the truth about Katie's encounter with Colonel Ryder or ensure her marriage to her strait-laced veterinarian fiancé in order to silence her about the Colonel's death at all costs.
That is correct folks. "ALL IN A NIGHT'S WORK" is basically a comedy about mistaken identity. You see, Tony Ryder and the Board members mistakenly believe she may have been the Colonel's past mistress. The reality is that Katie had found herself in the magnate's hotel room by mistake and under different circumstances. She had been fleeing from a drunken millionaire whom she had saved from drowning in the hotel's swimming pool . . . and who had repaid her Good Samaritan act with an aggressive attempt at seduction. So much for good deeds. Because Tony and the Board need funds to finance the magazine's expansion, they view Katie's encounter with the dead Colonel as a potential threat.
Superficially, "ALL IN A NIGHT'S WORK" seemed like one of those typical sex comedies that Hollywood studios made by the dozens from the late 1950s to the mid-1960s. I certainly would not describe the 1961 comedy as the best of the bunch. Its portrayal of Midwesterners struck me as bit one-dimensional. And modern-day filmgoers might find some of its attitude toward women slightly offensive. I refer to one scene in which Tony not only admire Katie for her brains, but also admire her ability to hide her brains. Like . . . what the hell? Regardless of those little peccadilloes and the fact that I do not regard it as one of the best mid-century sex comedies I have seen . . . I rather enjoyed "ALL IN A NIGHT'S WORK". In fact, I more than enjoyed it. I found it slightly unusual from the usual flicks of its genre.
What was it about "ALL IN A NIGHT'S WORK" that I found unusual? For me, the real humor stemmed from the corruption that reeked in the film's narrative. Whether that corruption came from the countless men who try to proposition Katie - including Tony, to the Board and Lasker's assumption that Katie was the Colonel's mistress without really knowing her story. In one funny sequence, Katie has a disastrous evening on the town with her fiancé Dr. Warren Kingsley, Jr. and his visiting Kansas parents, thanks to Tony's interference at two nightclubs and Mrs. Kingsley's negative judgmental attitude toward her. Yet, the most hilarious example of the corruption that permeated the film came from the topic of greed in the form of the Board of Directors. Desperate to acquire the bank loan to expand the magazine, they not only bemoaned the possibility of Katie blackmailing them but discussed various ways to silence her and ensure that loan. They were absolutely hilarious. The only other sex comedy that I believe permeated with corruption in the form of business survival was the 1961 Doris Day/Rock Hudson film, "LOVER COME BACK". Nineteen sixty-one was an interesting year.
Am much as I had enjoyed the movie's narrative, what I really enjoyed about "ALL IN A NIGHT'S WORK" was its cast. The movie featured first-rate performances from supporting cast members like Norma Crane, Rosemarie Stack, Ian Wolfe, John Hudson and a very funny Jack Weston, who portrayed the Palm Beach hotel detective who had first spotted Katie leaving Colonel Ryder's suite. Cliff Robertson gave solid support as Katie's upright fiancé Dr. Warren Kingsley Jr. Mable Albertson was appropriately prim and oppressive as young Warren's priggish mother. On the other hand, Charles Ruggles gave a very charming performance as Dr. Warren Kinglsey Sr., the only member of the Kingsley family who knew how to enjoy a good time.
However, there were at least five performances that I truly enjoyed. Three of them came from Gale Gordon, Jerome Cowan and Ralph Dumke; who portrayed the senior members of the Board Members. Watching them bemoan over the possibility of Katie being Colonel Ryder's mistress and plot to find ways to keep her silent were among the true highlights of the film. And then we have our two leads - Dean Martin and Shirley MacLaine. I just realized the pair had made six films together. Six. I suppose I should not have been surprised. Martin and MacLaine had great screen chemistry. And this was apparent in their scenes together. Martin's smooth charm and subtle sense of humor contrasted perfectly with MacLaine's more nervous and kinetic performance as the much put upon Katie. I also enjoyed Martin's subtle, yet sly reactions to the Board Members' bombastic plotting against the movie's leading lady. And what I also enjoyed about MacLaine's performance is how she managed to convey Katie's worldliness beneath a seemingly naive persona - especially when dealing with over amorous men.
Earlier, I had stated that I did not consider "ALL IN A NIGHT'S WORK" as one of the best sex comedies from the mid-20th century. Perhaps it is not one of the best. But I now believe it is one of the most original I have ever come across. It might also be one of my favorites from that particular era in Hollywood history, thanks to Joseph Anthony's solid direction; a first-rate screenplay written by Edmund Beloin, Maurice Richlin and the legendary Sidney Sheldon; and superb comedic performances from a cast led by Dean Martin and Shirley MacLaine. What else can I say?
Sunday, October 27, 2024
"ALL IN A NIGHT'S WORK" (1961) Photo Gallery
-.png)
.jpg)
Friday, August 12, 2022
"SPIDER-MAN" (2002) Review
"SPIDER-MAN" (2002) Review
I have been a major fan of the Marvel Comics character, Spider-Man, for a long time. When I was a kid, I used to read "The Amazing Spider-Man" comic strip from my local newspaper on a daily basis. I was also a regular viewer of the reruns from the 1967-70 animated series "SPIDER-MAN" and the 1978-79 television series, "THE AMAZING SPIDER-MAN", which starred Nicholas Hammond. So when Columbia Pictures released a movie version of the comic book web crawler twenty years ago, I was a happy camper.
Ironically, I have no memories of any particular episode from either the animated series or the live-action series. All I know is that I used to watch both. But there is no way I could ever forget director Sam Rami's 2002 film adaptation, which starred Tobey Maguire as Peter Parker aka Spider-Man. How could I? I own a DVD copy of the movie.
"SPIDER-MAN" is basically Rami and screenwriter David Koepp's take on the web slinger's origins. The movie begins with teenager Peter Parker living with his Uncle Ben and Aunt May in Forest Hills, a suburb in Queens, New York. Peter is in love with next door neighbor Mary Jane Watson and is best friends with Harry Osborn, the son of millionaire/scientist and Oscorp CEO, Dr. Norman Osborn; who seems to regard Peter more as a son than Harry. Peter attends a field trip with Mary Jane, Harry and other fellow students to a genetics lab. when he is bitten by a genetically engineered spider. He wakes up the following morning with perfect vision, fast reflexes, superhuman strength and the ability to emit web strings. His school fight with Mary Jane's bullying boyfriend, Flash Thompson, attracts Uncle Ben's attention, who has become concerned with Peter's recently distant behavior.
Meanwhile, Norman Osborn's company is in danger of losing its bid for a contract with the U.S. Army for weapons. Osborn tests his company's new performance-enhancing drug and becomes stronger. He also acquires a maniacal alter ego and murders his assistant. And Peter decides to use his new abilities to raise money. He enters a wrestling match to win $300 dollars. But the promoter scams him out of his full reward and Peter retaliates by refusing to help stop a thief from stealing the box office returns. The same thief ends up killing Uncle Ben during a carjacking. When Peter realizes that the thief and his uncle's killer are one and the same, he becomes guilt-ridden and decides to use his powers to become a masked vigilante following graduation from high school. In time, Peter aka Spider-Man and Osborn aka the Green Goblin battle it out for the safety of New York.
As much as I enjoyed "SPIDER-MAN", I must admit that it had its flaws. All of those flaws centered around Koepp's screenplay. One, I thought the story was a bit episodic, especially the first half that revealed both Spider-Man and the Green Goblin's origins. In fact, the movie could be easily divided into two halves - from the beginning to Peter's graduation from high school, and his activities and battles with the Green Goblin. Another major problem that stemmed from Koepp's screenplay was the dialogue. "SPIDER-MAN" turned out to be one of the two top movies that were released during the summer of 2002. The other was "STAR WARS: EPISODE II - ATTACK OF THE CLONES". While fans and critics criticized some of the dialogue in the latter film, they easily overlooked the cheesy dialogue that tainted "SPIDER-MAN", especially the smart-ass comments that poured from Spider-Man's mouth. And I found the Green Goblin's early attempt to convince Spider-Man to become an ally a bit contrived.
Fortunately, "SPIDER-MAN" possessed virtues that outnumbered its flaws. One, the movie was fortunate to have Danny Elfman as its composer. I thought he did a top-notch job that contributed greatly to not only the movie's, but the entire trilogy's atmosphere. Neil Spisak and his team did a superb job with the movie's production designs that gave it a colorful, comic-book style without going over-the-top. I was especially impressed by Spisak's designs for the genetic lab sequence and the Oscorp-sponsored fair sequence that featured the murders of the Oscorp directors. Spisak's production work was ably assisted by Don Burgess' photography. In fact, I would say that Burgess' work more than Spisak's gave the movie its colorful comic-book style.
Although I found Koepp's screenplay a bit episodic, I must admit that it featured some very exciting scenes that I will never forget. My favorites include Peter's wrestling match with Bonesaw McGraw, the murder of the Oscorp directors, and Spider-Man's rescue of Mary Jane from a bunch of thugs. But the two scenes that truly stood out for me and struck me as well directed by Rami were the Thanksgiving dinner at Peter and Harry's Manhattan apartment; and the final showdown between Spider-Man and the Green Goblin. The Thanksgiving dinner not only led to Osborn's discovery of Peter's identity as Spider-Man, it provided a deliciously subtle interaction between the millionaire and Aunt May, due to wonderful performances by Willem Dafoe and Rosemary Harris. Spider-Man and the Green Goblin's final confrontation led to a nail-biting moment in which the latter forced Spider-Man to choose between saving Mary Jane and the underage passengers of a Roosevelt Island Tramway car. The sequence also led to a brutal fight between the adversaries and one of the best lines ever to be uttered by a Marvel villain:
"This is why only fools are heroes - because you never know when some lunatic will come along with a sadistic choice."
I will also add that when I criticized Koepp's screenplay for being episodic, I really meant that it seemed to be somewhat divided between two complete stories. Once Peter assumed the role of Spider-Man, became a photographer for The Daily Bugle and engaged in his conflict with the Green Goblin, the movie picked up to become a force of nature.
Tobey Maguire nearly failed to become Peter Parker aka Spider-Man. Although Rami wanted him for the role, Columbia Pictures executives were hesitant to cast someone who did not seem to fit the ranks of "adrenaline-pumping, tail-kicking titans". Apparently, these guys never read any of the comic books. Without his Spider-Man outfit, Peter Parker was supposed to be a quiet, nerdy science student with a slight built. Not only did Maguire physically and emotionally fulfilled Peter's character with perfection, he also worked with a physical trainer to improve his physique for the Spider-Man scenes. His performances as Spider-Man really took me by surprise. I did not realize that he would be so effective as both an action hero and quiet nerd. And I like being surprised.
Koepp's portrayal of the Mary Jane Watson character differed from the comic books in many ways. One, Peter and Mary Jane never met until both were students at Empire State University in the comic books. Two, the comic book Mary Jane was a little more extroverted than the cinematic Mary Jane portrayed by Kirsten Dunst. And she seemed quite taken by Spider-Man, after he saved her during the Goblin's murder of the Oscorp directors. Despite these changes, Dunst gave an excellent performance with the character she was given and she had a very strong screen chemistry with Maguire, which culminated in the famous screen kiss that is still considered iconic. Also, Dunst's Mary Jane proved that friendship was a more valuable component than mere muscles, when she revealed at the end that Peter meant more to her than Spider-Man. Dunst also had a strong screen chemistry with actor James Franco, who gave an excellent performance as the insecure Harry Osborn, who longed for his father's attention and especially respect. Come to think of it, Franco also had strong chemistry with both Maguire and Willem Dafoe. Cliff Robertson was wonderful as Peter's Uncle Ben. He and Maguire were excellent in the Peter/Uncle Ben scenes that would end up reverberating in the next two movies. And Rosemary Harris was a delight as the warm-hearted Aunt May, especially in the Thanksgiving dinner scene and the hospital scene that featured her own heartwarming conversation with Peter. Despite being forced to utter some very cheesy dialogue, Willem Dafoe overcame this defect and gave a truly scary and fascinating performance as Norman Osborn aka the Green Goblin. Some of his best moments featured those scenes in which Osborn had conversations with his alter ego - the Goblin. No wonder his Green Goblin is still considered to be the best on-screen Spider-Man villain.
Stan Lee was ecstatic over J.K. Simmons' portrayal of The Daily Bugle editor-in-chief, J. Jonah Jameson. And I can see why. In some ways, it is a rather one-dimensional performance. Then again, I have always remembered Jameson as a one-dimensional character. But Simmons breathed life and humor into the role and ended up giving one of the best performances in the movie. It is too bad that the Betty Brant character was regulated as a supporting one. In the comic books, she was Peter's high school girlfriend and his first love. In "SPIDER-MAN", she is Jameson's friendly secretary, who was always coming to Peter's aid. Yet, Elizabeth Banks effused a great deal of warmth into the character that made her very likeable. I can also say the same about Bill Nunn's performance as editor Joseph "Robbie" Robertson. Bruce Campbell and Octavia Spencer provided some humorous moments as a wrestling announcer and a clerk who signs Peter up for a match.
Unlike many other fans of the "SPIDER-MAN" movie franchise, I never considered the 2002 movie to be the second best of those directed by Sam Rami. David Koepp's screenplay seemed a bit episodic to me. And it was filled with too many cheesy dialogue. But the screenplay did provide a strong and action-packed second half for the story. And I am one who cannot deny that Rami's direction, along with the production crew and an excellent cast led by Tobey Maguire overcame the screenplay's flaws and provided a first-rate comic book movie that I will never forget.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)