Showing posts with label dan curtis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dan curtis. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 11, 2025

"THE LOVE LETTER" (1998) Review

 

















"THE LOVE LETTER" (1998) Review

Twenty-seven years ago, CBS's "HALLMARK HALL OF FAME" anthology series aired a television movie titled "THE LOVE LETTER". This movie was an adaptation of Jack Finney's 1959 short story of the same title and has become a big favorite of many television viewers over the years.

"THE LOVE LETTER" begins when a computer games designer named Scott Corrigan and his fiancée Debra Zabriskie stumble across an old desk at an antiques store in a suburb outside of Boston, Massachusetts. Being a Civil War history buff as well, Scott buys the desk and later, discovers a letter written in 1863, hidden inside a secret compartment. The letter's writer is a woman in her late 20s named Elizabeth Whitcomb, who conveys her secret feelings and desires to no one in particular. Scott shows the letter to his mother, who believes he may actually be able to communicate with Elizabeth across time. Mrs. Corrigan encourages him to reply with his own letter. She also gives Scott a postage stamp from the mid 19th century, and suggests he mail it from a local post office that had been constructed back in 1857. After Scott follows his mother's suggestions, Elizabeth receives his letter from the local postman, setting in motion a line of communication and developing emotions between them that crosses the boundaries of time.

I might as well put my cards on the table. I am not into television movies from the "HALLMARK HALL OF FAME" series. In fact, I can only think of two or three productions that I found interesting. By the time I had come around to watching "THE LOVE LETTER", I did it for only two reasons - I love time travel stories and I am a Civil War buff. Despite having Cameron Scott and Jennifer Jason Leigh in the leads, I did not have any high hopes for this production. I also discovered that "THE LOVE LETTER" was not a faithful adaptation of Finney's short story. Instead of being set in and around both 1998 and 1863 Boston, Finney's story was set in and around 1959 and 1880s Brooklyn, New York. Whereas the Scott Corrigan character was engaged in the 1998 movie, the lead in Finney's story was a single man. Finney's tale also lacked a mother character for his leading man . . . whereas the 1998 television featured a mother character. The Elizabeth Whitcomb character was plagued by headaches and Finney's leading lady was not. In the 1998 movie, Elizabeth was an aspiring character. But the Elizabeth Worley character in the short story was not.

However, I never found it important for a movie or television series to be completely loyal to its source material, especially if the production in question managed to capture its true essence. Being just as good or even better also helps. I have never read Finney's short story, but I have read the synopsis. Personally, I believe the 1998 movie proved to be just as good as the former. Dare I say . . . perhaps slightly better? I believe the additions created by James S. Henderson's screenplay had added more oomph to Finney's tale. Changing the 19th century from 1880s Brooklyn to 1863 New England and making the leading man a Civil War buff really appealed to my sense of history. But what made this movie even more poignant for me was the addition of lookalikes for the two leads in the story. Scott eventually met Elizabeth's lookalike, a dog owner with whom he becomes acquainted in the movie's end; and Elizabeth met Scott's doppelgänger, Union Army officer Colonel Caleb Denby during the movie's second half. Is it any wonder that I was not surprised to learn Henderson had won the Writers Guild of America Award for Television: Long Form – Adapted.

But what made "THE LOVE LETTER" really worked for me was the developing romance between the two character via the exchange of letters. I also enjoyed how their letters affected their lives. Elizabeth's correspondence with Scott had encouraged her reconsider a marriage proposal from one of her father's neighbors - a man she did not love. Their correspondence also led Scott to reconsider his feelings for his fiancée, a very nice woman with whom he seemed to be going through the motions. After Scott's mother had pointed out that his correspondence with Elizabeth seemed equal to emotional cheating, the movie featured one well-done but painful scene in which Scott revealed the true nature of his obsession with the desk to his fiancée. "THE LOVE LETTER" featured other memorable scenes - Scott and Elizabeth sensing each other's presence on the staircase, inside the Whitcombs' house; Scott's biking accident; Elizabeth's romance with Caleb Denby; the old post office fire in 1998, Elizabeth's journey to Gettysburg, and the battle's aftermath; and Scott's first meeting with Elizabeth's doppelgänger. But the after effects of the protagonists' correspondence is what I remembered most about this television movie.

I certainly did not have a problem with the movie's production values, much to my surprise. Although the 1990s did feature some period television movies with decent production values, I never really considered them top notch. One had to turn to television miniseries for that. And although I found the production values for "THE LOVE LETTER" pretty decent, they did not exactly blow me away. I must admit that I found Dorothy Adams' costume designs very impressive. I was also impressed by Bill Blunden's editing, as he alternated the scene shifts between 1998 and 1863 with such ease. I was especially impressed by Blunden's handling of the sequence, which alternated between Scott's biking accident and Elizabeth's first meeting with Colonel Denby.

As much as I had enjoyed "THE LOVE LETTER", I did have a few issues with it. I had a minor issue with the hairstyle worn by actress Jennifer Jason Leigh. I had no problems with her costumes. But why on earth was her hair worn in such a loose and vague fashion . . . as if the movie's hairstylist tried to create some hybrid fusion between 1860s and 1990s hair styles? I really hate it when a production crew tries to infuse modern fashion, dialogue, music and yes, even hair styles in a period setting. But my main issue with the film focused on Scott's communication with Elizabeth. All the latter had to do was write a letter and shove it inside the desk's special compartment in 1863. As the desk's current owner, Scott was bound to discover it. But Scott's method of communicating with Elizabeth struck me as . . . well, contrived. Thanks to his mother's instructions, he had to use a 19th century U.S. stamp on his letters' envelopes and mail them through an old post office constructed in the mid-19th century. This method enabled his letters to magically transport back to Elizabeth in 1863. I realize that the movie's screenwriters had adapted this method of time traveling from the original short story. But why utilize such a contrived method in the first place? Scott was not a wealthy man. The movie made this clear when he found himself bargaining with an antiques store owner in order to purchase the desk. Nor was he a business owner. Scott was an employee at a video game design company. An unused 19th century stamp would have probably be worth a good deal of money, even in 1998. Considering the number of letters that Scott had sent to Elizabeth, I can only wonder how much money he had spent to purchase more 19th century stamps. Would it have been easier for the screenwriters (or even Jack Finney, who wrote the original short story) to allow the desk or its secret compartment to be some kind of magical entity that allowed objects - including letters - transport through time?

But there is one thing I had no complaints about was the movie's cast. "THE LOVE LETTER" featured some solid performances from the likes of David Dukes, Kali Rocha, Myra Carter, Laurie Kennedy and Richard Woods. But I must admit that I found myself especially impressed by supporting performances from Daphne Ashbrook, Estelle Parsons, Irma P. Hall and Gerrit Graham. But why beat around the bush here. The pair who really carried the film . . . who really made this story worked were the movie's leads, Campbell Scott and Jennifer Jason Leigh. I thought Scott (the actor) did an excellent job in conveying his character's penchant for hiding or suppressing his passion for history, along with his growing obsession toward and love for Elizabeth with subtle reactions and a dry wit. Scott also had the additional task of portraying Colonel Caleb Denby, the Union officer who managed to woo Elizabeth with a charismatic charm. Leigh had never received the opportunity to delve into the personality of Elizabeth's 1998 doppelgänger. But I thought she gave a superb performance as the more openly emotional Elizabeth, who reacted with surprise and joy at the idea of corresponding with a mystery man who understood her, and who found herself struggling with a loving family determined to keep her constrained within a social straight jacket.

Over the past two-and-half decades, "THE LOVE LETTER" has become something of a cult favorite among fans of science-fiction/fantasy and period drama. After my recent rewatch of this television drama, I can see why it has remained very popular. I thought director Dan Curtis and screenwriter James S. Henderson did an excellent job in adapting Jack Finney's short story. And their efforts were enhanced by the excellent performances from the cast led by Campbell Scott and Jennifer Jason-Leigh.





Thursday, April 10, 2025

"THE LOVE LETTER" (1998) Photo Gallery

 


















Below are images from "THE LOVE LETTER", the 1998 television adaptation of Jack Finney's 1959 short story. Directed by Dan Curtis, the television movie starred Campbell Scott and Jennifer Jason Leigh:





"THE LOVE LETTER" (1998) Photo Gallery























Monday, December 4, 2023

"THE KANSAS CITY MASSACRE" (1975) Review

 













"THE KANSAS CITY MASSACRE" (1975) Review

Following the release of the 1967 movie, "BONNIE AND CLYDE", Hollywood release a spurt of biopics - for the theaters and television - about Midwestern and Southern-born gangsters (mainly bank robbers and kidnappers) during the Depression-era. Mind you, Hollywood had waited a few years before releasing or airing these films in earnest. One of these productions happened to be the 1975 television movie, "THE KANSAS CITY MASSACRE".

The 1975 film, directed by Dan Curtis (producer and director of the 1983 miniseries, "THE WINDS OF WAR"), "THE KANSAS CITY MASSACRE" is a spin-off of the 1974 television movie, "MELVIN PURVIS: G-MAN". The latter was a fictionalized account of F.B.I. Special Agent Melvin Purvis's hunt for gangster/kidnapper Machine Gun Kelly. In "THE KANSAS CITY MASSACRE", Purvis hunts down Charles "Pretty Boy" Floyd, Adam Richetti and Frank "Jelly" Nash; following their robbery of an Oklahoma bank. This hunt eventually leads to a famous shootout involving local gangsters, lawmen and the F.B.I. at the Kansas City Union Station in June 1933, which is set a year earlier than the 1974 production.

The movie begins with Floyd and Richetti helping Nash escape from a prison chain gang. Following Nash's escape, the trio robs a bank in Enid, Oklahoma; where they encounter fellow Depression-era gangsters. A who's-who's list of these gangsters - including John Dillinger, Homer Van Meter and Lester "Baby Face" Nelson - converge at the Floyd homestead to discuss the money laundering of their heists. Purvis' efforts to capture all or most of them at Floyd's home is ruined by an ambitious state trooper with an itchy trigger finger. Purvis' pursuit and the trio's efforts to evade him and get their money laundered eventually put them in the crosshairs of the Kansas City crime and political scenes of local gangster/club owner Verne Miller, organized crime figure John Lazia and local city commissioner Herbert Tucker McElwaine; along with the infamous shootout at Kansas City's Union Station.

Many were right to regard "THE KANSAS CITY MASSACRE" as a spin-off of 1974's "MELVIN PURVIS: G-MAN". Granted, both telecasts featured Dale Robertson as the famous F.B.I. special agent. Also, both productions are set during the Depression era of the early-to-mid 1930s and featured actors Harris Yulin and John Karlen. However, Yulin and Karlen ended up portraying different characters in "THE KANSAS CITY MASSACRE" from the ones they had portrayed in "MELVIN PURVIS: G-MAN". So . . . the 1975 movie was definitely not a prequel. Like "THE KANSAS CITY MASSACRE" and many other historical dramas, this 1975 docudrama is a mixture of fact and fiction. The narrative used Dale Robertson's voiceover to give historical gravitas to the production, especially in the movie's introductions to the infamous criminals that appear. But yes, "THE KANSAS CITY MASSACRE" is just as much fiction as fact. One, Melvin Purvis never played a direct role in the Kansas City shootout. Historians are not certain if Kansas City gangster John Lazia had played a role in what happened at Union Station. Some believe he may have informed Pretty Boy Floyd and Adam Richetti about the plot to rescue Nash from the F.B.I. But the movie would have you believe he had personally recruited Verne Miller to appear at Union Station with a handful of gunmen . . . to kill Nash, instead of rescuing him. As for Nash, he had escaped from prison earlier than 1933. Honestly, there are many aspects of the film's narrative I would regard with a wary eye. And that includes most of the characters wearing long or heavy coats, despite the movie's setting of April-June 1933. Did these inaccuracies limit my enjoyment of the movie? Well . . .

Who am I kidding? Inaccurate or not, I cannot deny that "THE KANSAS CITY MASSACRE" was an entertaining television production. One, the televised movie featured some interesting action sequences. For me, the best included the shootout at Floyd's farm early in the story, the actual massacre at the Kansas City Union Station and what I regard as the pièce de résistance, Floyd and Richetti's confrontation against Miller, with Purvis and the F.B.I. arriving at the last minute. Two, I have to give kudos to television movie's production values. With the contribution of Paul Lohmann's cinematography, Charles Pierce's set decorations, the Art Department coordinated by William M. Bell and John S. Perry's costume supervision; Dan Curtis managed to recreate the Midwest and Southwest of the early 1930s. Granted, I found the hairstyles worn by some of actresses in this production seemed to be lacking. A few hairstyles looked as if they came straight from the mid-1970s and others, including the one worn by actress Lynn Loring, looked as if they were trying to reflect the early 1930s and failing. There were moments when I actually felt I had traveled back some 90 years in time. As for Curtis, I thought he managed to keep the movie's pacing on track with his energetic pacing. Ironically, his direction seemed a far cry from the slightly ponderous style of the 1983 miniseries, "THE WINDS OF WAR".

I think the best virtue for "THE KANSAS CITY MASSACRE" proved to be its cast. The real Melvin Purvis had been a 29-to-30-year-old South Carolinian during the spring and summer of 1933. Dale Robertson, who had hailed from Oklahoma, was at least 51-to-52 years old, when he shot this movie. Honestly, he should have been the last actor on Earth to portray the Special F.B.I. agent. However, this was his second time at bat as Purvis and as before, he did a stupendous job as the Federal lawman, carrying the movie and allowing his presence to be felt without any real effort. Another first-rate performance came from Bo Hopkins, whose portrayal of Charles "Pretty Boy" Floyd seemed to be as laconic and skillful as Robertson's. And like the older actor, he managed to effectively allow his presence to be felt. "THE KANSAS CITY MASSACCRE" also featured excellent performances from Matt Clark, who struck me as perfect, as the volatile gangster Verne Miller; and the always excellent Robert Walden, who seemed spot-on as the romantic Adam Richetti. Other first-rate performances came from Mills Watson as the ambitious, yet pragmatic Frank "Jelly" Nash; Scott Brady, who oozed with slimy charm as the corrupt Commissioner Herbert McElwaine; Sally Kirkland as Floyd's long-suffering ex-wife Wilma Floyd; Harris Yulin (a veteran of "MELVIN PURVIS, G-MAN") as the venal gangster John Lazia; John Karlen (another veteran from the 1974 TV-movie) as Purvis's right-hand man, the stalwart Sam Cowley; and Philip Burns as the ambitious and trigger-happy state policeman, Captain Jackson. I especially want to compliment Lynn Loring's performance as Vi Morland. I thought she did a first-rate job conveying the complex and flaky nature of the Kansas City nightclub singer, who seemed to be conflicted between her memories of her past romance with Richetti and her volatile relationship with the unreliable Miller.

Look, "THE KANSAS CITY MASSACRE" is not perfect. The movie seemed a bit too in love with the "Pretty Boy" Floyd character, which explained why it never revealed his fate. Yes, it had its share of historical inaccuries, including questionable hairstyles. Lead actor Dale Robertson was at least 20 years too old to be portraying F.B.I. Agent Melvin Purvis. And the influx of Depression-era gangsters in the film's first 30 minutes had struck me as unnecessary. But I cannot deny that despite its lack of historical accuracies, "THE KANSAS CITY MASSACRE" told a first-rate and exciting story, thanks to screenwriters William F. Nolan and Ric Hardman. It also benefited from strong production values, energetic direction from Dan Curtis and some excellent performances from a first-rate cast led by Robertson. It may not be perfect, but I thought it was pretty damn good and entertaining.

Monday, October 2, 2023

"THE KANSAS CITY MASSACRE" (1975) Photo Gallery

 















Below are images from "THE KANSAS CITY MASSACRE", the 1975 prequel to the 1974 television movie, "MELVIN PURVIS, G-MEN".  Directed by Dan Curtis, the television movie starred Dale Robertson as F.B.I. Special Agent Melvin Purvis:



"THE KANSAS CITY MASSACRE" (1975) Photo Gallery